Operationalising and establishing the Quadhis courts to enable access to justice including handling of disputes on issues of SRHR for Muslim women and girls.
In the case of Mwanga Matullah & IWILAP & Ors versus Attorney General, the petitioners filed a constitutional petition challenging the omission to comply to operationalise the Quadhis courts established by with Article 129 (1) (d) of the constitution of Uganda. This case highlights the importance of operationalising and establishing the Quadhis courts to enable access to justice and handling of disputes on issues of SRHR for Muslim women and girls.
Current status:
The government of Uganda is yet to file its response to the case.
Importance
The recognition of Quadhis courts will ensure access to justice and handling disputes, particularly concerning issues of sexual and reproductive health rights (SRHR) for Muslim women and girls. Quadhis courts have the flexibility to tailor solutions to SRHR issues based on Islamic jurisprudence and principles. This can lead to more nuanced and customized approaches to addressing SRHR challenges within Muslim communities.
Next steps
The case will proceed to a hearing where both parties will present their arguments.
